![]() ![]() Pr% : The % of drop-backs where the QB was pressured (per Pro Football Focus)Īdot : The average air yards thrown per attempt.Īy/c: The distance between the line of scrimmage to the point of reception.Ĭpoe: Completion % over an expected amount based on game situation (air yards, down, distance, field position etc.) ![]() Ttt : The average time from snap to the point when a QB throws. ![]() Wrsr : The % of designed carries that earn more epa than the median league value in similar game situations (down, distance, field position etc.) adjusted for 4th qtr game script and weighted by result (TD, first down, other) Opd: The epa/d given up by opponent defenses in all games other than the QB/team being measuredĮd% : The % of plays on early downs (2) that are QB drop-backs. I guess he really liked the left side.ĭrop-back: Attempts + Sacks + Scrambles + accepted Defensive Pass Interference (DPI) The short passes weren’t working nearly as well as the longer ones. This game tied his quickest release time of the year. The season drop-off from Pittman to is more than concerning.Ĭompletion rate and accuracy were both about average this week, which is an improvement. That’s still not good, but it is a step in the right direction.Įugene Tyrone made a critical appearance. ![]() His season-long yards per attempt jumps to 20th with the 20th avg pass depth. However, he turned that around and a spectacular finish cemented a 8.0 ypa game. He had a completion drought to start the 2nd half, that saw his yards per attempt dip down to the “this is why we can’t have nice things” zone. He bounced back from a horrible New England game to perform well above average in the 4 most important stats. The second half saw more and larger negative plays, but he also had some big completions that made up for it. In the first half, Wentz was on fire, providing a lot of positive value plays. On the year his success rate is a bit below average and his epa efficiency is a bit above average, so he is hovering near the intersection of the axes. In these efficiency/success graphs, the upper right quadrant is a good place to live and Wentz did that in week 16. Combine that with no turnovers and you get a highly efficient and successful game (8th epa/d, 13th psr). He made those yards count by converting a lot of first downs (11th 1st%) and throwing TDs (9th TD%). That yardage was diluted a bit by sacks (14th sk%), but Wentz still maintained an above-average net yardage efficiency (13th ny/d). His accuracy was about average (18th cpoe) and the wide receivers did not provide much incremental yac (14th yac, 13th yacoe), but the overall yardage efficiency was good (10th ypa). Wentz was quick to get rid of the ball (26th ttt) on shorter than average attempts (19th adot), but had the 7th longest completions (7.7 ay/c). That meant it was critical for Carson Wentz to deliver on his passing downs. The Colts played a run-first scheme (27th ed%) and for the first time since week 2, the run game was woefully inefficient (30th arsr). (Glossary of terms at the end of the article) Ranks are based on the 30 QBs that have played through Sunday night. Commentary will be brief but feel free to let me know in the comments that stats aren’t everything. I will probably modify the charts throughout the season. Yes, O-Line, receivers, and play-calling impact these numbers but they are primarily QB measures. Thanks to the nflFastR project and NFL NextGen Stats for the timely sources of data.įor those of you new to this, I will publish key QB stats each week judging how well the Colts passing game performed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |